video gaming
THE OLD REPUBLIC GAZETTE
Discussing politics, energy, books, computers, tech and Bitcoin
Tuesday, March 26, 2024
What is a waste of electricity/energy?
video gaming
Thursday, February 8, 2024
Human Induced Climate Change List
I hope that the following contribution to the National Climate Task Force will help that White House office to save some time and taxpayer money on researching the impacts of global warming/climate change.
Wednesday, November 8, 2023
Bitcoin at $423 !
Click to enlarge
Friday, March 31, 2023
Inconvenient Truth: 32 Climate Predictions Proven False
Thursday, December 29, 2022
More Love and Positivity
May: Yes, Brian. That would be nice.
B: Yes, I agree, it would be a blessing. Do we want more hate and negativity in the world?
M: That would be a hard no.
B: Okay, do you agree that our thoughts become words and sometimes our thoughts become actions? Like I can decide in my head that I am going to rob a bank and then that can lead to the action of robbing a bank, correct?
M: Yes.
B: And our words and actions often impact those people around us, right?
M: Yes, our words and actions do impact our family and friends and other people who come into contact with us.
B: So, if we have positive or loving words and actions, the people around us will be impacted by that love and positivity, perhaps even by speaking or doing things that are positive or loving themselves, right?
M: I would think so.
B: So, by being positive or acting in ways aligned with love, we are spreading love and positivity in the world, correct?
M: At least the people that we come into contact with would see and feel that love and positivity.
B: But the people that come into contact with our positivity could spread positivity and love to people they meet too, isn’t that true? The positivity and love could propagate out like ripples in a pond.
M: Yes, it’s true.
B: So, my love and positivity could multiply and have a much wider spread than I know, right?
M: Yes, it can spread wider.
B: Do you think the world is a better place if love and positivity are spread from me?
M: Of course, yes, but in a limited way.
B: But is the world a better place? Yes or no?
M: Yes.
B: Do you think if we speak or act from a place of hate or have negative things to say that this would affect or impact people around us?
M: I’m sure it would.
B: So, the world would be a worse place, right? Even if in a limited way.
M: Yes, it would be worse.
B: Do you know what quantum entanglement is?
M: I’ve heard of that. Can you remind me what it is?
B: Quantum entanglement is the phenomenon where an atom acted upon will cause a reaction on another atom somewhere else in the room, the world, or even at the other end of the universe. In physics, this is also called action at a distance, or as Einstein dubbed it, “spooky action”. It is a proven phenomenon. In fact, it isn’t just those two atoms that are connected in a quantum way. Potentially every atom in the universe is connected to every other atom in the universe. This is quantum entanglement. Everything is “tangled” together. You could also think of it as a web of connectivity between all matter.
M: That’s amazing that such a thing could be.
B: May, do you think the human condition is positive and loving overall, or is it more negative and hate aligned overall?
M: There is love in the world, Brian, but it seems there is just more negativity and hate these days.
B: I agree, May. And we know how to make it better in at least a limited way, correct? I mean by being positive and loving to those we know.
M: Yes, it’s certainly better than the opposite.
B: I want to tell you though, May, that if you are positive and act in harmony with love, you may have an effect on someone you know, someone in North Korea, or even someone on the international space station. Your thoughts, words and deeds will have an effect on someone because of quantum entanglement. Your positivity and your loving actions will go beyond your physical interactions with your contacts to potentially anywhere or everywhere on Earth because all atoms are potentially entangled.
M: Well, I haven’t thought of it in just that way before.
B: Would you agree that potentially, because I have a positive and loving way of being in the world, that this might have a beneficial effect on other people far away in the world due to quantum entanglement?
M: I would agree that potentially other people might benefit from your positive attitude.
B: And if so, wouldn’t the world be a better place?
M: Yes, it would.
B: What if I stayed in my house and didn’t see anyone, but I was positive and had loving thoughts and speech, would other people benefit from my positivity and love? Would the world be a better place due to my solitary but loving ways?
M: If we are quantumly entangled with other people, then the other person would benefit and the world would be a better place.
B: Let’s look at some indications that quantum entanglement might have something to do with mind or thought. One indication is mental telepathy, the idea that ideas, images, or thoughts can be shared between two minds. Quantum entanglement might be a good way to explain mental telepathy. Another indication is telekinesis, that’s the idea that a person can move or affect objects using thought. Again, quantum entanglement, the idea that I might be entangled somehow with the ball I want to move with my mind would provide a good explanation for telekinesis. Another indication of quantum entanglement working in the world is remote viewing. That’s the idea that a person could see what’s happening somewhere else in the world by clearing his or her mind and focusing on that place and somehow seeing what is happening in the room or area that he or she is concentrating on.
M: Maybe when multitudes of people pray together is another indication of entanglement.
B: I agree. Praying together broadcasts positivity and hope over our web of entanglement. Do you think that we have established a connection between the mind and quantum entanglement?
M: Many phenomena seem to be explained by it, yes.
B: So if I stay home and am solitary but I have a positive and loving attitude, I could potentially have an effect on the overall negative condition that the world is in, right?
M: As much as one person could, yes.
B: But we don’t know how many atoms are entangled with Atom A at a time do we? It might be one at a time it might be two, it might be 100, 1000, or it might be entangled significantly with all of them. We don’t know the mechanisms but we do know there is likely entanglement between all atoms. And since we see the potential of the mind’s similar entanglement with other minds or objects or human bodies, we don’t know to what extent our attitude will entangle with other minds or things, but we do have good evidence that it can. So, we may affect one person at a distance, or many, with our attitude, correct?
M: I would agree with that.
B: So if we want the world to change, to be more positive and loving, we need to act in ways that are more positive and loving, right?
M: Yes.
B: And do we need to speak in ways that are more positive and loving?
M: Yes.
B: And how about thinking, would my thinking positively and in ways aligned with love change the world to a more loving and positive place?
M: Yes, it would!
B: Then as much as possible we should try to delete negativity and hate from our actions, spoken words, and thoughts, and replace them with positive and loving actions, spoken words, and thoughts, right?
M: Yes, apparently having positive thoughts, words, and deeds will have a beneficial effect on the world.
B: And the world will be a better place as a result. Don’t be a transmitter of negativity. Be a transmitter of positivity and the human condition on this world will change, and the world will be a better place to live because more people will be positive and loving.
Thanks for working through this with me, May. Sometimes asking questions is the best way to get to the bottom of something.
M: Well, Brian, it was an exercise certainly worth doing knowing that we could have a better human experience just by thinking it!
Tuesday, November 29, 2022
Retain Your Personal Transportation Options
Saturday, November 5, 2022
Thursday, August 18, 2022
China Needs a Gorbachev
Saturday, February 19, 2022
Antminer S3 Overclock / Underclock Testing
I know there's not a lot of need for Antminer S3 overclock / underclock testing since this Bitcoin miner was first introduced by Bitmain in June of 2014 and was superseded by other faster ASIC miners not long after that. But there are some good reasons to use the Antminer S3 (if you can find one) for home mining. I know there are a few Antminer S3's still out there in 2022 and they needn't be in a closet or gathering spiderwebs in the basement.
- It makes a great lottery miner. If you don't think 30 or 40 dollars per month is a lot to pay for lottery tickets, you could run the S3 for that much electricity (more or less depending where you live) and have the chance of winning 6.3 Bitcoin. The lowest underclock would cost around $15/mo. With this setup you don't have to drive to the convenience store all the time to buy lottery tickets. That said, solo mining for Bitcoin offers a very slim chance of solving a block, just as does a Powerball drawing offer a very slim chance of winning. You can also pool mine if you want to stack Sats. Additionally, you can mine for other SHA-256 coins which will have lower network difficulty levels and thus be "easier" to solve blocks for (i.e., Bitcoin Cash, Digibyte, XEC, and others).
- The miner gives the house heat in the winter. So it serves the dual purpose of mining for SHA-256 coins and warming the house, thus reducing the work of the main heat system by whatever small amount. In summer you can underclock the S3 (if you're keeping it in the house) so that the heat it adds to a room is negligible.
- The Antminer S3 is more powerful than USB stick miners and less hassle.
- It is easy to make it quiet. If you are going to use a miner in the house it has to be reasonably quiet. This miner doesn't get as hot as an Antminer S7 or Antminer S9 or any of the other multiple terahash miners that exist these days. Since it doesn't get as hot, it doesn't need as vigorous a fan as the S3 originally came with. Replace the original fans with quiet PC case fans of the same size and with 4 pin connectors (~3000 RPM). Even at the highest hashrate these are more than enough for cooling the S3. Make sure your PSU is quiet as well.
The testing data below is going to be frustrating for people with Antminer S3's that have all the chips available for hashing. My S3 doesn't, so I had to do the testing with 24 working chips when there are usually 32. I really did this testing for myself. Still, you may be able to glean some useful information from this testing, such as wattage differences between settings and hashrate differences from low clock speed to high.
Testing was done using the firmware version "Fri Jan 9 20:41:34 CST 2015". This version of firmware has the ability to adjust clock speed (Frequency) and voltage. However, my testing and the testing of other miners has concluded that the voltage setting in the firmware doesn't do anything, or much of anything at all. If you want to adjust voltages, getting a power supply (PSU) that has adjustable output voltages is your best bet. In my testing the only thing that made a difference was changing the clock speed.
Different clock speeds often caused 1 or 2 chips to display an X in the miner's interface which means they aren't hashing. This causes a lower hashrate and lower wattages. Sometimes a reboot at that clock speed would help those chips, sometimes not.
Fan speeds were affected by clock speed, hashrate, and by the HVAC heat coming on in the room, but you can see in the chart that lower clock speeds result in lower fan speeds and thus quieter miners.
Hardware errors were never much more than 0.01%, but when they were under that I noted it as low hardware errors in the chart (LHWE). Perhaps those are more efficient or stable speeds to run at.
In the 0725 voltage part of the chart I tested with one cable into each hashboard instead of two. There was no difference between the two options.
The chart did not convert well onto a blog page so it is presented here as an image which you can click on to enlarge. If you right-click on the image you can save it and thus enlarge it when viewing.
- It makes a great lottery miner. If you don't think 30 or 40 dollars per month is a lot to pay for lottery tickets, you could run the S3 for that much electricity (more or less depending where you live) and have the chance of winning 6.3 Bitcoin. The lowest underclock would cost around $15/mo. With this setup you don't have to drive to the convenience store all the time to buy lottery tickets. That said, solo mining for Bitcoin offers a very slim chance of solving a block, just as does a Powerball drawing offer a very slim chance of winning. You can also pool mine if you want to stack Sats. Additionally, you can mine for other SHA-256 coins which will have lower network difficulty levels and thus be "easier" to solve blocks for (i.e., Bitcoin Cash, Digibyte, XEC, and others).
- The miner gives the house heat in the winter. So it serves the dual purpose of mining for SHA-256 coins and warming the house, thus reducing the work of the main heat system by whatever small amount. In summer you can underclock the S3 (if you're keeping it in the house) so that the heat it adds to a room is negligible.
- The Antminer S3 is more powerful than USB stick miners and less hassle.
- It is easy to make it quiet. If you are going to use a miner in the house it has to be reasonably quiet. This miner doesn't get as hot as an Antminer S7 or Antminer S9 or any of the other multiple terahash miners that exist these days. Since it doesn't get as hot, it doesn't need as vigorous a fan as the S3 originally came with. Replace the original fans with quiet PC case fans of the same size and with 4 pin connectors (~3000 RPM). Even at the highest hashrate these are more than enough for cooling the S3. Make sure your PSU is quiet as well.
Check out: The Essential Guide to Bitcoin Mining: A Cryptocurrency Tutorial
Paperback, Kindle, Nook, Kobo, Google Play
Monday, October 11, 2021
News-Free Vacation
For example, what would you have done (mid-weekend) if you knew about the fire in Paris? What action would you have taken had you known about the kidnapping of the Algerian ambassador? The fiery argument in Congress would have had an effect on your mood and your psyche but other than that...nothing.
Now imagine taking this news-free weekend and extending it to one month or six months or even indefinitely. Imagine the vacation for your brain, mind and soul. Imagine the improvement in your mood and outlook and possibly even your health!
And not to worry, if you need to know something it will get to you if it is so important. Friends, relatives, or Google will somehow let you know what you need to know. But other than that, life is much better without news, my friends. You can worry about the things that truly impact your life and family, things happening in your neighborhood, at your school or church, in your town. These are the areas where you can have an impact, where you can act and react in love.
Try the news-free vacation (include Twitter and Facebook feeds as well because they are full of "news" you don't need to know) and see if you don't feel better. Not only will you feel better, but you will have more time to do things in your life that you enjoy. Carpe diem!
Tuesday, July 6, 2021
When a new century or millenium actually begins
A century is equal to 100 years, no more or less. Let's work it out below...
year 0 (day 1 to day 365) is 1st year of that century
year 1 (day 366 to day 730) is 2nd year of that century
year 2 is the 3rd year of that century
year 9 is the 10th year of that century
year 10 is the 11th year of that century
year 50 is the 51st year of that century
year 90 is the 91st year of that century
year 99 is the 100th year of that century.
This means that at the completion of the 99th "labeled" year the century (100 years) has been fulfilled and completed and the next year is the beginning of the new century. That is, the moment the year turns to 100 is the beginning of the new century (2nd). In the same vein, the moment that 2000 began was the beginning of a new century and a new millenium (not the year 2001 as some people believe).
year 100 is the 101st year
year 1000 is the 1001st year
year 2000 is the 2001st year
year 2020 is the 2021st year
The new decade starts at the beginning of the n0 year
The new century starts at the beginning of the n00 year
The new millenium starts at the beginning of the n000 year
Hopefully this ends the debate as to when decades, centuries and milleniums begin.
Happy 21st century!
Monday, June 21, 2021
Bitcoin Since 2015 Chart
Check out: The Essential Guide to Bitcoin Mining: A Cryptocurrency Tutorial
Wednesday, April 7, 2021
Cryptocurrency Price vs. Usefulness
Bitcoin ($56,000 on 4/7/2021) is an asset more than it is a currency, though it is a currency too, it's just that its high fees and slow transaction times limit its use as a currency (for instance, you wouldn't want to buy coffee with it, but you'd not hesitate to buy a Tesla with it). Because it is an asset and viewed by more and more people as a safe haven asset, it makes sense that its price would be high and track higher (due to limited supply). But if you look at most other cryptocurrencies you'll see that they were not created to be investments, they were created to be useable currencies for one function or another. BAT is a currency used by the Brave browser, LBRY coins are used on the video streaming site LBRY and Odysee, Filecoin is used in the Filecoin distributed storage ecosystem, and there are many more examples.
Bitcoin Cash, Dash, Monero, Nano, and Digibyte are cryptocurrencies which are meant to enable cheap and fast transactions person to person, they are not intended as investment vehicles and do not need to be priced at hundreds of dollars per coin to work well. As an example, look at Digibyte which is $0.08 per coin today and functions well as a person to person payment option.
Monero will function just as well as Digibyte as a payment option but the price of one Monero is $267 per coin today. The higher price is a function of the relative scarcity of the coin and the increased amount of usage which Monero has. But, the bottom line is that it will cost you about the same to send $20 with either coin, almost nothing, and transact just as quickly. So as far as usability is concerned, it doesn't matter what the price of a cryptocurrency is, you can still get 20 bucks worth of whatever coin you want to use and send it to your friends.
My point is, don't disregard the usability of a cryptocurrency based on low price and don't give too much regard to a cryptocurrency's usefulness based on a high price.
Check out: The Essential Guide to Bitcoin Mining: A Cryptocurrency Tutorial
Paperback, Kindle, Nook, Kobo, Google Play
Friday, April 2, 2021
Baseball shoots itself in foot.
Thursday, March 11, 2021
Bitcoin = Lambo
Wednesday, March 3, 2021
How Does Bitcoin Network Difficulty Affect Mining Profits?
Bitcoin network difficulty exists to make it more difficult to solve a block on the Bitcoin network so that the rate of block solving stays at around 10 minutes per block. But network difficulty doesn't just make it more difficult just for you, it makes it more difficult for everyone equally over the network. Over time rising difficulty has had the effect of obsoleting many generations of Bitcoin mining machines. The reason for this obsolescence is not that the machines no longer work but that they become much too expensive to run in terms of energy costs per Bitcoin retrieved. If you had free energy, then any Bitcoin miner can contribute shares to a pool and rake in some free Bitcoin, but not many people have access to free energy.
Bitcoin network difficulty also has the effect, when solo mining, of making it nearly impossible for older Bitcoin mining machines to ever solve a Bitcoin block except in a lottery-like fashion where 1-in-a-billion may do so. Even for the latest generation Bitcoin miners, solo mining a Bitcoin block is difficult because of the hundreds of thousands of late model Bitcoin mining machines competing at the same time to solve a block. But if you hope to solve a block while solo mining for Bitcoin you had better have the latest machines with the latest chips or you are just playing the lottery.
Bitcoin network difficulty affects pool mining a little bit differently. When you are mining in a pool, your Bitcoin mining machines never (!) have to solve a block to get paid, they just have to contribute shares to the mining that is going on at the pool. The more shares your miner contributes, the more share of the reward you get when someone in the mining pool solves the block. So to look at it simplistically, if there are 100 miners in the pool and they are all mining at the same rate, each miner will get paid the same amount when one of the miners solves a block. The network difficulty is not going to lower your share or the payout as long as someone in the pool can still solve a block. An increased network difficulty will make it more difficult to solve a block, yes, but it is more difficult for everyone at EVERY mining pool. Again, this favors (or biases) Bitcoin block production towards the newest, fastest Bitcoin miners. So, if you have a pool with 10,000 terahash of mining power and they are all Antminer S9s and you have a pool with 10,000 terahash of Antminer S19s, the pool with the S19s is going to solve most of the blocks because those are the latest/fastest miners. You can check blockchair.com and see which mining pools are solving the most blocks and assume that they are composed of the latest machines. If you want more frequent payouts you could sign up to mine with that pool. More frequent payouts will probaby result in smaller payouts. More hashpower and more miners on a pool result in smaller payouts.
So in conclusion, Bitcoin network difficulty will result in less chances of solving a block when solo mining but have little effect when you are mining in a pool since everyone is subject to the mining difficulty increase. Also, don't mine at a pool where all the miners are using older equipment because they will find blocks much less frequently.
Happy mining, happy HODLing.
Check out: The Essential Guide to Bitcoin Mining: A Cryptocurrency Tutorial
Paperback, Kindle, Nook, Kobo, Google Play
Wednesday, February 17, 2021
Rush Passes February 17, 2021
Rush Limbaugh has passed on February 17, 2021 from lung cancer. In the past he had been an avid smoker of cigarettes and cigars, and though he had quit the cigarettes some years ago, he still had the occasional cigar until shortly before his cancer diagnosis. He had been having chemotherapy, which had extended his time with us by many months and for which his listeners are grateful. He was 70 years old.
Thank you, Rush Limbaugh for your words of wisdom over the years and for being a guiding light to me and many others in the conservative movement. You were indeed the voice of conservatism and the right for many years. You will be truly and sorely missed here on Earth but you will be welcomed with much love into your next phase of life.
Tuesday, February 16, 2021
President Trump's Web Presence
Sunday, February 14, 2021
The Truth About the COVID-19 Vaccine, Featuring Dr. Simone Gold, of America's Frontline Doctors
*A cytokine storm, also called hypercytokinemia, is a physiological reaction in humans and other animals in which the innate immune system causes an uncontrolled and excessive release of pro-inflammatory signaling molecules called cytokines. Normally, cytokines are part of the body's immune response to infection, but their sudden release in large quantities can cause multisystem organ failure and death. (Wikipedia)
Help stop forced experimental vaccines. These are not time-tested flu or measles vaccines. They are still experimental. Sign the petition below.
Saturday, February 13, 2021
Hate for President Trump Fails to Convict
Despite the fact that in this second impeachment there was again no evidence that President Trump did anything wrong, 7 Republicans, 48 Democrats and 2 Independents voted, not based on evidence, but on party affiliation, hate for Trump, or delusion. Forget the fact that the impeachment of a former president is unconstitutional by itself, but these 57 hooligans debased their offices, debased the U.S. Senate, and destroyed the representative trust placed in them by the citizenry of this country by voting to convict someone of wrongdoing when the evidence suggested otherwise. This impeachment was simply founded in hate for a man who was successful in his job where they and others in his position have failed constantly and repeatedly.
Question: Guilty or Not Guilty (Article of Impeachment Against "Former" President Donald John Trump )
Vote Date: February 13, 2021, 03:39 PM
Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania
Ben Sasse Nebraska
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska
Susan Collins of Maine
Bill Cassidy of Louisiana
Richard Burr of North Carolina
Tuesday, February 9, 2021
Trusty RINOs Vote for Impeachment Trial to Move Forward
Thursday, January 21, 2021
Wednesday, January 20, 2021
Supreme Court Must Not Allow Impeachment Trial
Friday, January 15, 2021
List of Anti-Liberty Companies
Wednesday, January 13, 2021
List of Republicans Who Have Betrayed MAGA
The following is a list of Republicans who did not side with President Trump for election integrity or who have subsequent to January 6 "stabbed" President Trump in the back. Remember these names when the next election for them arrives or they ask you to buy their book or watch their movie. They will not be welcome in the new Patriot Party (should there be one). You and I can grow this list together! Please help by commenting below with the names of other Republicans who have undercut President Trump and give a source for their betrayal (words or deed) and we will add them to this list. Thanks!
Senator Mike Lee
Senator Lindsey Graham
Liz Cheney (congresswoman, voted to impeach)
Megan McCain (irrelevant)
VP Mike Pence
ex-senator Kelly Loeffler
Senator Tom Cotton
Ben Sasse
Nicki Halley
Senator Lisa Murkowski
ex-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
Senator Pat Toomey
ex-Governor Chris Christie
ex-Governor Mike Huckabee